(https://imgur.com/8Ypybs3.jpg)
Vice City Police Department
Office of VCPD Command Staff
Sergeant Andrew Davidson
From: Desk of Sergeant Andrew Davidson
To: Mr. Klaus - VCPD Complaints.
Dear complainant, upon reviewing the evidence we have come to a conclusion.
Review:
As aforementioned, Mr. Klaus was suspected by VCPD officers in the area where illegal items were present. VCPD Officers stated that they saw you brandishing a firearm, in the evidence you also stated that you picked up the chrome shotgun and an MP5.
If a person brandishes a weapon after being asked to leave, and in a high-risk situation, then an Officer has acted in accordance with policy and responded to an imminent threat.
Current evidence appears circumstantial, it does not fully show the incident in order for VCPD Command to determine a breach of policy.
The law states presumption of innocence, I stand by that principle when handling police complaints for the sake of not issuing wrongful disciplinary action.
Officers advised you multiple times to leave the area, as shown in the evidence. We currently do not have enough to prove that VCPD Senior Officer David Brand broke regulations and acted outside of policy.
Final Verdict:
As the current evidence is circumstantial, we are unable to determine a breach of policy. As for the conclusion, Officer in question did not break any regulations. As no additional evidence or statement was provided in this 48 hours, the report will be closed with the final verdict in effect.
Officers cleared of any misconduct. No disciplinary action will be taken.
If you are unsatisfied with this verdict, you are free to escalate this to the Vice City Court of Law.
Sincerely,
Sergeant Andrew Davidson
VCPD Command Staff.