GTA: IV > Closed Complaints

[CLOSED] LCPD Deputy Chief Steve Seagal

(1/3) > >>

Dav:



1. Your full Roleplay name:
Dav Nixon

2. LCPD Officers' name & rank:
Steven Seagal
LCPD Deputy Chief

3. Time and date of the incident:
4:40PM
6/15/2019

4. Short description of the incident:
I tried to solve my complain with a simple talk with officer Mac but after I failed to find justice I had to do this.

The incident occured on my patrol, while I tried to pull over a guy who was driving with his vehicle on high speeds (120kmh+ city side), changing lanes like maniac and ignoring my megaphone calls I rushed and suspected him as fast as I could in order take him out of his vehicle and secure that no one will get hurt.

In my rush I used /su reckless driving, while I could use 'ts evade' as they informed me but the point still the same,
I had to deal with a guy who was putting in danger every single citizen on the road.

Laws that the suspect has broke before being suspected

--- Quote ---Refused to pullover while warned via Megaphone and bliping sirens to him.
--- End quote ---

--- Quote ---Act 11.1
All drivers must abide the speed limits of 80 km/h in city and 120 km/h on a highway.
--- End quote ---

--- Quote ---Act 11.2
All drivers must drive on the right side of the road.
--- End quote ---

--- Quote ---Act 11.14
Any driver that is danger to himself or others on a public road by repeatedly violating the laws of vehicle operation can be subject of temporary license revoking.
--- End quote ---
And with all the above facts, we come to the momment that I was on a pursuit against the suspect as he was trying to escape from the police stop,
suddenly officer named Steve appeared without being involved into the scene and was not aware of what was going on and unsuspected the guy as 'invalid' blaming me that 'I should pull him over and write him a ticket' without even comming in contact with me via police radio and avoiding any roleplay intention to solve the confusion

My point is that yeah, technicaly the fact that the reason was reckles driving instead of ts evade is a true fact, but telling me that I should pull him over and write a ticket without even asking about the situation and taking acts this randomly it's atleast unethical in my eyes, especialy if you blame the freecop for this.

Officer Steve could handle it way more proffesionaly and in a way that could be involved in a roleplay instead of just 'invalid' while we was clearly on pursuit
and the suspect was clearly braking the laws. A small typo mistake doesn't mean that the law brake hasn't commited, Please take care!

5. Witness(es):
MadMike aka UC (Real name will be remain covered for obvious reasons)

6. Evidence(s):

And after 5 minutes we were already in pursuit and suspect was already trying to evade
suddenly unsuspected..


Signed,
Dav_Nixon

Peter Kovacs:
Friendly greetings,


I am Captain Peter Kovacs and I will be taking your report.
Before proceeding, the dashcam footage provided in this case is heavily distorted to where I cannot get an entire aspect of what happened. However that doesn't mean the report cannot go on. I am awaiting a statement from Deputy Chief Steven Seagal.

Steven S.:
Greetings,

The reason was indeed wrong, nothing refrained you to re-suspect your target again fixing the reason upon given instructions from the higher ranked though. You instead found better to threat me with the following statement: "I don't want to argue with you, Do not again." instead of talking me about any roleplay scene you were conducting, I find this pretty unethical too. I would also like to add that the improper usage of a command doesn't include any roleplay.

Dav:
Greetings

Mr. Steven, I would like to apologise if you though that the way I responded to you was rude, but instead I would like to point out that you should
consider your actions too, I neither flamed you neither said something bad beside that I don't want to argue with you.

And only because I knew that what you did was an rushed judge without giving any oportunity to your fellow officer to respond for the
'invalid reason', so believe me, I was more insulted than you with what happend, it's my first time I have to deal with something like this.

Taking as fact that it could be more valid and without a problem to respond via our radio and inform me of what is going on
you instead decided that it's better solution to unsuspect the ongoing pursuit and with the only respond 'next time pull over, and write ticket'

After this you already have destroyed our ongoing roleplay and I lost my interested to re-suspect as you saying above. as I found it
uncessary measure, and somehow out of place. Everything could be cleared out in an investigation or even beter on a simple communication on our radio
Greetings to Peter Kovacs

Evidence of the pursuit are missing due to a problem of my dashcam, but there is no doubts that what I said is absolutly true and without
anything extra sauces in it.

Let me clear out that I'm not looking for any punishment or anything beside that you must start considering the cooporation with your fellow officers
even in the cases that there is an invalid reason, you MUST! still take a full idea of what's going on before you take any judgments this is all I'm looking for
In the end, did you understand that you marked a suspect that broke every single law as an invalid over a single typo?

If you feel proud for this action or anyone who taking part in this case feeling that this thing was absolutely handled with the best solution
then please withdraw my complaint.

Dav Nixon

Steven S.:

--- Quote from: Dav on June 15, 2019, 21:50:32 pm ---And only because I knew that what you did was an rushed judge without giving any oportunity to your fellow officer to respond for the
'invalid reason', so believe me, I was more insulted than you with what happend, it's my first time I have to deal with something like this.

--- End quote ---

I didn't say I felt insulted, I said that there was no reasonable attitude coming from you toward me in radio. You're turning this into a useless drama which could have been solved right on the moment telling me that you just mistaken reason and fixing the reason through re-suspecting the target again with the right reason.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page