Ordinance IX:The restricted area was obviously and visually the beach and not the pier which I was standing on. It was never announced that the pier was as well restricted. Neither was I told that when I was suspected. I was simply told to leave to which I defended myself.
IX.I.II: Temporary access denial: Law enforcement agencies and government officials can deny access to some areas or an entire building for national security reason or any valid reason for a limited amount of time. The denial must be justified but can apply to any propriety or area of the United State of Argonath.
You were standing at the pier aiming a weapon at me and multiple members of ADF, I know not only me but multiple people saw that you did so.
(http://www.argonathstunt.com/images/airdivisionlogo.png) | INTERNAL AFFAIRS Dear involver's, This case will be handled by me, on the behave of Air Division Command. At the time of the accident [WS]Kangaroo was operating as a Flying Officer of the Air Division. The flying officer will be contacted, to respond to this report. Signed by, Caion 'C' Cortis ARPD Air Division Command |
You were standing at the pier aiming a weapon at me and multiple members of ADF, I know not only me but multiple people saw that you did so.I never aimed any weapon at anyone. Show me proofs.
Confirming won't do it. Show me proofs.You were standing at the pier aiming a weapon at me and multiple members of ADF, I know not only me but multiple people saw that you did so.
As a witness, I can confirm this.
I was on Air Division duty at the time. I had asked you to leave mutliple times and I had officers telling me you were aiming a weapon. Therefore my suspection. As for the investigation, yes I may of rushed it. But I don't usually perform investigations on my own suspects. That's why I was trying to obtain another officer.First off, I never aimed any weapon at anyone. I'm not some random person in the server with no common sense. I knew how high profile was the event and what could lead to if I shot or aimed at anyone. On the other hand, you can not tell a person to leave a public area. The restricted area was the BEACH and only the BEACH. There wasn't any police barriers, cars or police covering the pier. It was NEVER announced that the pier was closed as well. CBF only said that the BEACH was restricted, not the pier. You can not just randomly come and block me off a public property, which I as a citizen have complete right to. Had it been previously announced by CBF or were there any barriers, police cruisers or police blocking the pier, I would have never gone there.
Good morning dear Air Division Command staff, dear plantiff Charlie_Corleone and dear Officer [WS]Kangaroo,The spot was never announced as a restricted spot. As I said earlier...
As you can see in some of the screenshots provided, i was present in the wedding when this has happened.
I was representing a government agency at the time, and my task was to make sure that everything was secure and that there are no possible threats for the participants of the wedding or the president.
Mr. Charlie Corleone has entered an area who was considered restricted at the time, since it was a potential sniping spot and was endangering the public and important public figures that were attending to the wedding. I have spotted him and Mr. Harris Corleone walking around at that spot and i indeed saw you aiming something, due to a long distance i could not figure out if it was a camera or a sniper rifle. Therefor i have informed ARPD and on my behalf they were sent to check you two out. The positions you were stationed in were potentially dangerous, this is the reason why you were asked to be removed from the location. Officer did nothing wrong as he has warned you enough to leave the place before actually suspecting you.
I'm also attaching some evidence:
(http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/4496/i6mt.jpg)
(http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/6689/8ttk.jpg)
(http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/7891/yxq4.jpg)
(http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/8178/ugik.jpg)
Have a nice day and i'm looking forward for the outcome of this report.
Signed,
Maxwell Peterson Adams
Central Intelligence Agency Special Agent
Central Intelligence Agency Internal Affairs Committee
Had it been previously announced by CBF or were there any barriers, police cruisers or police blocking the pier, I would have never gone there.
Basically I asked you multiple times and I approached you saying to leave.You fail to read what I wrote.
The restricted area was the BEACH and only the BEACH. There wasn't any police barriers, cars or police covering the pier. It was NEVER announced that the pier was closed as well. CBF only said that the BEACH was restricted, not the pier. You can not just randomly come and block me off a public property, which I as a citizen have complete right to. Had it been previously announced by CBF or were there any barriers, police cruisers or police blocking the pier, I would have never gone there.
Any gates or barriers that were used were all kept on the beach, NONE were restricting the pier.
CBF only said that the BEACH was restricted, not the pier.
You can not just randomly come and block me off a public property, which I as a citizen have complete right to.I can defend my rights. I can stay on a public property for as long as I want.
Being the Commander in Charge of Pulse in that event, I confirm that the area was closed down due a security threat. I also confirm the statements of Pulse.There was no barriers restricting the piers. Therefore it was not shut down. And you confirming statements of Pulse, don't what what statements. But I, in no way, was a security threat. I was falsely accused by [WS]Kangaroo for aiming a weapon. I was accused of entering a restricted area which at that time was never announced restricted or seemed restricted as there was NOTHING at all restricting the pier.
Basically I asked you multiple times and I approached you saying to leave.You fail to read what I wrote.QuoteThe restricted area was the BEACH and only the BEACH. There wasn't any police barriers, cars or police covering the pier. It was NEVER announced that the pier was closed as well. CBF only said that the BEACH was restricted, not the pier. You can not just randomly come and block me off a public property, which I as a citizen have complete right to. Had it been previously announced by CBF or were there any barriers, police cruisers or police blocking the pier, I would have never gone there.
Any gates or barriers that were used were all kept on the beach, NONE were restricting the pier.QuoteCBF only said that the BEACH was restricted, not the pier.QuoteYou can not just randomly come and block me off a public property, which I as a citizen have complete right to.I can defend my rights. I can stay on a public property for as long as I want.
(http://www.argonathstunt.com/images/airdivisionlogo.png) | INTERNAL AFFAIRS Dear Charlie Corleone, Flying Officer [WS]Kangaroo had requested you a multiple, to leave the area. You have rejected to comply with his reques. According Act XXIV: Act XXIV: Disobeying the law is a straight jailing unless there is another punishment prescribed by the law. You have to comply with the law enforcement, if they have a valid reason for it. According Ordinance IX a law enforcer has to justify himself. The Flying Officer had a valid and legit reason to denied the temporarily access. But you rejected to comply, therefore Act XXIV allows him, to suspect you. However three eyewitnesses have spotted you aiming, a weapon. Since the president was attending at this event, this could be considered as a high security threat. Signed by, Caion 'C' Cortis ARPD Air Division Command |
The problem is Charlie, that we on the island, saw you aiming a weapon (yes a weapon, not a camera but a weapon) at us, at that moment I informed PulseEffect and a few other officers (including Dean Knight) that you we're aiming a weapon towards us, due to the fact the president was attending you were a security threat, and we responded how I did. It was my call that you had a firearm, but there are multiple people that can confirm you did.Don't try to twist the story. You people first said that I aimed a Sniper, when I proved that I did not have a sniper at all. You guys took advantage of me admitting to have other weapons. Show me proper proofs of me aiming weapon at anyone.
I have spotted him and Mr. Harris Corleone walking around at that spot and i indeed saw you aiming something, due to a long distance i could not figure out if it was a camera or a sniper rifle.
(http://www.argonathstunt.com/images/airdivisionlogo.png)INTERNAL AFFAIRS
Dear Charlie Corleone,
Flying Officer [WS]Kangaroo had requested you a multiple, to leave the area. You have rejected to comply with his reques.
According Act XXIV:Act XXIV: Disobeying the law is a straight jailing unless there is another punishment prescribed by the law.
You have to comply with the law enforcement, if they have a valid reason for it.
According Ordinance IX a law enforcer has to justify himself. The Flying Officer had a valid and legit reason to denied the temporarily access. But you rejected to comply, therefore Act XXIV allows him, to suspect you.
However three eyewitnesses have spotted you aiming, a weapon. Since the president was attending at this event, this could be considered as a high security threat.
Signed by,
Caion 'C' Cortis
ARPD Air Division Command
They told you to leave, you did not, failing to comply is a crime. End of the story.Constitution also says that I have the right to remain where ever (public place) I want as long as it's not restricted. I can defend my rights.
The problem is Charlie, that we on the island, saw you aiming a weapon (yes a weapon, not a camera but a weapon) at us, at that moment I informed PulseEffect and a few other officers (including Dean Knight) that you we're aiming a weapon towards us, due to the fact the president was attending you were a security threat, and we responded how I did. It was my call that you had a firearm, but there are multiple people that can confirm you did.Don't try to twist the story. You people first said that I aimed a Sniper, when I proved that I did not have a sniper at all. You guys took advantage of me admitting to have other weapons. Show me proper proofs of me aiming weapon at anyone.
It was a camera, NOT a weapon. Stop twisting the story.I have spotted him and Mr. Harris Corleone walking around at that spot and i indeed saw you aiming something, due to a long distance i could not figure out if it was a camera or a sniper rifle.
This guy here admits that He couldn't see what I was aiming as I was at a very large distance from other officers. How can you accuse me of something when you don't evne have proper proofs?
ALL the officers were far away from me, they don't evne have any idea what I was aiming. They just saw me "aiming", weapon or not, they have got no idea as I was literally about few hundred metres away from them.
(http://www.argonathstunt.com/images/airdivisionlogo.png)INTERNAL AFFAIRS
Dear Charlie Corleone,
Flying Officer [WS]Kangaroo had requested you a multiple, to leave the area. You have rejected to comply with his reques.
According Act XXIV:Act XXIV: Disobeying the law is a straight jailing unless there is another punishment prescribed by the law.
You have to comply with the law enforcement, if they have a valid reason for it.
According Ordinance IX a law enforcer has to justify himself. The Flying Officer had a valid and legit reason to denied the temporarily access. But you rejected to comply, therefore Act XXIV allows him, to suspect you.
However three eyewitnesses have spotted you aiming, a weapon. Since the president was attending at this event, this could be considered as a high security threat.
Signed by,
Caion 'C' Cortis
ARPD Air Division CommandThey told you to leave, you did not, failing to comply is a crime. End of the story.Constitution also says that I have the right to remain where ever (public place) I want as long as it's not restricted. I can defend my rights.
I'm the only one here who has provided any proof that I was innocent and was right all along. The officer has still not provided anything that proves me I am wrong.
So you admit you were aiming "something"By your logic media persons are considered security risks. Now you're twisting the story, I never denied having aimed something. What I denied was aiming any kind of weapon that may be harmful to anyone. A camera in no way is a weapon or harmful to anyone. Stop it.
That still can be counted as a risk. Regardless if it was actually or not. We took it seriously and did what we thought was correct and that was to remove you from the area. We asked once and then I heard other members over TeamSpeak shouting that you were aiming something, I checked it out, I asked you to leave and you refused, hence a suspection.
Because I and another officer in the teamspeak channel, both aimed our sniper to see what weaponry you we're using, and with weapon, I ment sniper.Now you're saying that you were aiming a sniper at an innocent civilian? Thank you.
(http://www.argonathstunt.com/images/airdivisionlogo.png) | INTERNAL AFFAIRS Dear involver's, The ARPD Air Division command has investigated this case and determined that the case will be closed, without further consequences for the reported Flying Officer [WS]Kangaroo. This decision has been made on the follow facts: The reporter, Charlie Corleone has admitted that he was aiming at the restricted area. To due the distance the Flying Officer could have misinterpreted the object that the reporter was holding. So he requested you to leave the pier, according Act XXIV you have to comply with this request. But you failed to do, so he was permitted to suspect you. This action can be justified by the fact, that he wanted to be sure than to be sorry. Since the president was attending. Although multiple eyewitnesses do claim that they have seen that neither it can be proven that Charlie Corleone was carrying or aiming any firearms nor it can be proven that he wasn't. Signed by, Caion 'C' Cortis ARPD Air Division Command |