Abusing weaponary on duty. using combats on a standing still suspect infront of cityhall the incident earlier of misusing your combat on others has been witnessed by matthew also thats why he is the witness. and he will provide the evidence of you abusing your weaponary. And you agreed when i told you not to use combats, you failed to follow my orders which is another fact why you are on this complaint.Your lack of evidence in your claims proves nothing but my innocence. Until you provide such thing, I do see no reason to continue replying. Should Mathew do provide evidence, I'll be happy to respond to your claims. As for him being a "witness", shouldn't really contribute much due to the possibility of lying.
Edit: You didnt state in extreme situations which makes sence to the fact you aint following our regulations.
Lying? Hahah!! Why should i make a whole report against you with all lies in it? What the **** is the logic of that... will be waiting for matthew his part in this reportNor that I am, but your evidence proves that I am not wrong. I bet you can figure out the rest.
I have indeed witnessed the excessive use of force by officer TiMoN.Honestly I do not care if you're an FBI Agent, a SAPD Captain, or Gandalf himself, please provide evidence supporting your claims.
He used combat shotgun against unarmed suspect who was using fists to assault another civilian.
Afterwards the suspected assaulter took a run for it and officer TiMoN used combat shotgun to neutralize him.
Screenshots show you with your combat shotgun which is a heavy weapon which is not needed on a unarmed suspect"Not needed" doesn't mean a "not allowed". Can you prove the fact that I used it on anyone?
Screenshots show you with your combat shotgun which is a heavy weapon which is not needed on a unarmed suspect"Not needed" doesn't mean a "not allowed". Can you prove the fact that I used it on anyone?
Not needed, the pictures show the evidence we need which is at least that you used it while it was not needed.Screenshots show you with your combat shotgun which is a heavy weapon which is not needed on a unarmed suspect"Not needed" doesn't mean a "not allowed". Can you prove the fact that I used it on anyone?
So a picture of me is taken aiming a gun at a suspects who gave me a weapon seconds ago, which is undeniable proof that he is heavily armed considering that the weapon was a sniper rifle. Since you're basing your outcome on estimates, suggestions and possible outcomes, bear in mind what I just said. Oh and since everyone is fabricating evidence from witnesses, I can assure you the fact that the suspect tried to stab me in the neck with a knife and then proceeded to shoot.Screenshots show you with your combat shotgun which is a heavy weapon which is not needed on a unarmed suspect"Not needed" doesn't mean a "not allowed". Can you prove the fact that I used it on anyone?
The image shows you aiming the weapon at a unarmed suspect. This can be considered Circumstantial evidence and it allows us to draw a conclusion that ,given the opportunity, you may have used it on that suspect, and it is likely that you have done so before. Using these conclusions which is supported by the circumstantial evidence and witness statements rules out the need for Direct evidence (IE; A picture of you shooting an unarmed civillian with a combat shotgun)
So a picture of me is taken aiming a gun at a suspects who gave me a weapon seconds ago, which is undeniable proves that he is heavily armed considering that the weapon was a sniper rifle. Since you're basing your outcome on estimates, suggestions and possible outcomes, bear in mind what I just said. Oh and since everyone is fabricating evidence from witnesses, I can assure you the fact that the suspect tried to stab me in the neck with a knife and then proceeded to shoot.Screenshots show you with your combat shotgun which is a heavy weapon which is not needed on a unarmed suspect"Not needed" doesn't mean a "not allowed". Can you prove the fact that I used it on anyone?
The image shows you aiming the weapon at a unarmed suspect. This can be considered Circumstantial evidence and it allows us to draw a conclusion that ,given the opportunity, you may have used it on that suspect, and it is likely that you have done so before. Using these conclusions which is supported by the circumstantial evidence and witness statements rules out the need for Direct evidence (IE; A picture of you shooting an unarmed civillian with a combat shotgun)
Screenshots show you with your combat shotgun which is a heavy weapon which is not needed on a unarmed suspect"Not needed" doesn't mean a "not allowed". Can you prove the fact that I used it on anyone?
Too bad he can't prove it.Screenshots show you with your combat shotgun which is a heavy weapon which is not needed on a unarmed suspect"Not needed" doesn't mean a "not allowed". Can you prove the fact that I used it on anyone?
You must be lucky if you make a screenshot right on the moment you fire the weapon.
I am not a part of this but I just want to mention it, the screenshot indeed gives a clear view that you had the opportunity to shoot him when you were aiming at him.
A weapon like a shotgun isn't needed in such situation when he's on the ground already.
He already has proven it with the screenshots.His screenshots prove nothing, however Mathew's show me AIMING at him which I have explained why.
But I'm not allowed to post here, so good luck.
Aiming with a combat shotgun on a unarmed suspext which is already into costudy is enough to charge you after a clear warning.He already has proven it with the screenshots.His screenshots prove nothing, however Mathew's show me AIMING at him which I have explained why.
But I'm not allowed to post here, so good luck.
He wasn't in custody as he attempted to murder me. I was "warned" after the situation, don't give me bullshit.Aiming with a combat shotgun on a unarmed suspext which is already into costudy is enough to charge you after a clear warning.He already has proven it with the screenshots.His screenshots prove nothing, however Mathew's show me AIMING at him which I have explained why.
But I'm not allowed to post here, so good luck.