Argonath RPG Police Department

Information => News & Announcements => Topic started by: Louis Keyl on February 04, 2011, 03:37:40 am

Title: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Louis Keyl on February 04, 2011, 03:37:40 am
Hello,

The SAPD Should present Three state attorneys at the Court. These attorneys will be the only ones able to create cases in the Criminal Courts and to input Criminal Charges. These Attorneys Should know the constitution perfectly and know how to interpret it, Also should have knowledge about the Argonath Court and the Government.

Thanks, Main Judge Louis Keyl.



And to clarify Something:

Only Lieutenants+ Are allowed to approve Official undercover operations, in which any crime committed on this operation will be Excused from the Eyes of the Law as long there is a good purpose behind the crime (I.E: Drug bust on known mafia member). If any undercover officer performs operations without the direct authorization of the Lieutenant, The court will take the acts of the officer as CRIMINAL and an Actus Reus will be declared on the case, ruling it invalid.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: SafetyMoose on February 04, 2011, 04:36:54 am
Vince was supposed to send us this list a long time ago but it never happend. I hope we get it this time....
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Sushi on February 04, 2011, 07:09:20 am
So essentially, any and all drug busts must be approved before a go ahead is given?

I'm assuming this is in response to the filing against the SAPD recently by Mike Hawk?
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Mack on February 04, 2011, 07:58:25 am
Won't speak much.

However, just because a crime family makes a legal front, of assumingly legal services, doesn't mean they are separated from the crimes they comit - despite them telling they aren't associated. Nor does it change the fact that Hans do commit crimes.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Chief J. Schappell on February 04, 2011, 22:08:56 pm
So essentially, any and all drug busts must be approved before a go ahead is given?
I'd assume so. They don't want rogue officers going out alone without approval and doing busts without first getting evidence and notifying the courts of their actions. Otherwise, you're basically going outside the scope of your duties.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: SafetyMoose on February 04, 2011, 22:12:42 pm
Cases in criminal Courts were ONLY allowed to be made by State Attorneys, do the the SAPD not giving us the list before, it was never enforced. Now we are enforcing it.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Louis Keyl on February 09, 2011, 03:29:38 am
State attorneys must be chosen Soon.

Any current case has until the Tuesday 22th, Febraury to get an state attorney to represent the case otherwise it will be closed.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Alan Demarest on February 14, 2011, 04:59:36 am
Still no state attorneys? Really? How many months has it been since it was requested?

Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Janar on February 14, 2011, 15:28:56 pm
Not even a month.
First post was made on 4th, today is 14th, so only 10 days.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Sushi on February 14, 2011, 15:37:47 pm
I think it was in reference to the previous statement that Moose referred too.

About how a prior request was made for SAPD Attorneys.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Chief J. Schappell on February 14, 2011, 19:31:41 pm
Well they said SAPD only has until the 22nd. That's 8 days away.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: [Rstar]Vince on February 15, 2011, 02:56:48 am
Oh alright I see how it is. Just sayin' that last topic that was posted ended up with Mario Rinna ridiculing the whole system of attorneys and then it fell deep into a pile of pages back.

So just for clarification, the attorneys will be the ones making the cases representing SAPD against criminal organizations (example) just like in real life? Again, just wanting to clarify as there was a whole controversy back in the old topic.



Any SAPD Senior Officer or above may apply to be an SAPD Attorney. You must send a reason why you wish to be selected as one as well as your knowledge of the constitution of the United States of Argonath. The minimum requirement is two paragraphs. One paragraph is considered 5-6 sentences. The minimum amount you must be serving is at least 6 months - 1 year from the time you first received Senior Officer rank. This is to ensure only the experienced can represent us in cases. Please send all applications to my inbox via forum PM with the subject "SAPD Attorney Application".
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: [Rstar]Vince on February 15, 2011, 02:58:43 am
Well they said SAPD only has until the 22nd. That's 8 days away.

What are you, counting the days away?
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Boozman on February 15, 2011, 03:14:54 am
Why are you counting the days away*
You failed to correct him. His post was fine the way it was, Kenny.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: [Rstar]Vince on February 15, 2011, 03:48:00 am
Why are you counting the days away*
You failed to correct him. His post was fine the way it was, Kenny.

And you failed to try and correct yourself after saying and removing "tehehehe". ;)

Anyway please no more off-topic, I don't want this topic to turn out like the previous.
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Kenny on February 15, 2011, 03:50:14 am
Cool...
Title: Re: Court Letter - Three SAPD Attorneys
Post by: Chief J. Schappell on February 15, 2011, 06:48:16 am
Well they said SAPD only has until the 22nd. That's 8 days away.

What are you, counting the days away?
I'm not. I was answering Janar's question.

Vince, may I recommend moving this to a SA:MP SAPD Command board and making a topic where they can apply? When they check this, the first thing they are going to see is the discussion. I would make a fresh topic with the information so it's attention-grabbing and they see it immediately.

@The courts: Is this just for SA:MP SAPD, or is it going to later be required for all other PD's as well?
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal