Argonath RPG Police Department

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: JunkMan on April 24, 2011, 11:45:14 am

Title: Undercover update idea
Post by: JunkMan on April 24, 2011, 11:45:14 am
1-i think undercover should not be showed in /rank because it can be used against cops as against criminals catching them dealing for example
2- when an undercover suspect someone it puts undercover instead of his name, it will help the UC to have the ability to suspect someone near him without the suspect knowing who is the undercover which will make the UC wont be caught easily. for example:"X(X) was been suspected by an undercover reason: planing for a riot" and senior officers plus can see who suspected the suspect in case of investigation.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: SeanC on April 24, 2011, 12:38:16 pm
I like this idea, Ziad, very nice..
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: [R*]Drix on April 24, 2011, 13:00:36 pm
First one is already made, as about the second one i don't know.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Nicholas Baker on April 24, 2011, 14:03:56 pm
Only undercover officers can see in rank if someone has UC Rights.

Second one is ok i guess
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: FlameMan on April 24, 2011, 15:11:33 pm
"TestName(ID) was suspected by an undercover detective for reason."
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Giovanni_Blake on April 24, 2011, 15:30:31 pm
"TestName(ID) was suspected by an undercover detective for reason."

yeah
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: JunkMan on April 24, 2011, 15:32:31 pm
"TestName(ID) was suspected by an undercover detective for reason."
This  :v:
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: SeanC on April 24, 2011, 15:41:56 pm
"TestName(ID) was suspected by an undercover detective for reason."
Yeah, would be awesome especially for the new San Andreas Detective Agency..
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: [SN]GHunter on April 24, 2011, 16:00:56 pm
+1
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Janar on April 24, 2011, 16:17:24 pm
2nd is pointless idea.
Only UC cop and suspect, cop suspects him, then it's obvious that the suspecting person was UC cop.
Grab an assault team and tell them to suspect to not blow your cover.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: JunkMan on April 24, 2011, 17:03:18 pm
its more secured janar.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Nexus Riggs on April 24, 2011, 19:39:10 pm
1st one would be kind of abuse since it has more publicity more corruptions may occur like example: Mafia member or new cop decides to be funny and reveals an important undercover person as Mafia or new cop may not care or not know the importance. Undercover suppose to be totally confidential, only to be seen by assigned Police Department.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Allison on April 24, 2011, 20:44:11 pm
The first idea is already in place, you can only see if they are undercover if you are an undercover officer as well. As for the 2nd idea, I support it as it gives more ability to not be specified as the UC officer directly.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Ronnel on April 24, 2011, 22:45:27 pm
If the first idea is implemented then understand that if any ARPD or non-UC cop gest suspended or demoted for treating an UC cop like a criminal, this will be the end of any UC rights.

The second idea is even worse.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: JunkMan on April 26, 2011, 11:22:23 am
The second idea is even worse.
what is the worse in the second idea ? i will take you to IRL when a UC is arround bunch of criminals that are doing something he launch on radio that bunch of criminals are doing anything and put them as suspect but do they know ? they don't because he is simply a UC.
The first idea is already in place, you can only see if they are undercover if you are an undercover officer as well. As for the 2nd idea, I support it as it gives more ability to not be specified as the UC officer directly.
Every single command can be abused.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: iMarkz on April 26, 2011, 12:00:25 pm
Supported both of two ideas.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Ben on April 26, 2011, 20:01:14 pm
I would also suggest that when non-UC people /rank people who are undercover, they cannot see that they have an SAPD Rank. E.g. :

Ben_Blake's Rank is ARPD Officer
Normal Duty Rights

instead of how it is at the moment, still showing the SAPD ranks  :gandalf:
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: JunkMan on April 26, 2011, 21:47:54 pm
I would also suggest that when non-UC people /rank people who are undercover, they cannot see that they have an SAPD Rank. E.g. :

Ben_Blake's Rank is ARPD Officer
Normal Duty Rights

instead of how it is at the moment, still showing the SAPD ranks  :gandalf:
this :D
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Nexus Riggs on April 27, 2011, 00:40:12 am
I would also suggest that when non-UC people /rank people who are undercover, they cannot see that they have an SAPD Rank. E.g. :

Ben_Blake's Rank is ARPD Officer
Normal Duty Rights

instead of how it is at the moment, still showing the SAPD ranks  :gandalf:
This could be interesting! support it!
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Fred on April 27, 2011, 09:41:34 am
I dont see any point for that ben, since ONLY uc officers can see you are UC officer too.

And when a SAPD officer recieve a UC badge, that is because he is trustable.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Gabriel_VogelBR on May 02, 2011, 00:36:03 am
SUPPORTED
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Ben on May 02, 2011, 00:43:49 am
I dont see any point for that ben, since ONLY uc officers can see you are UC officer too.

And when a SAPD officer recieve a UC badge, that is because he is trustable.
Last time I checked, UC Officers had "normal duty rights" and non-UC have "Normal duty rights". See the difference?  ;)
Also, having an SAPD rank when you have a UC name looks a little suspicious  :gandalf:
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Chief J. Schappell on May 02, 2011, 02:36:56 am
I dont see any point for that ben, since ONLY uc officers can see you are UC officer too.

And when a SAPD officer recieve a UC badge, that is because he is trustable.
Last time I checked, UC Officers had "normal duty rights" and non-UC have "Normal duty rights". See the difference?  ;)
Also, having an SAPD rank when you have a UC name looks a little suspicious  :gandalf:
Well that also depends on who is looking, and how far undercover you really are.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Allison on May 02, 2011, 02:45:15 am
I dont see any point for that ben, since ONLY uc officers can see you are UC officer too.

And when a SAPD officer recieve a UC badge, that is because he is trustable.
Last time I checked, UC Officers had "normal duty rights" and non-UC have "Normal duty rights". See the difference?  ;)
Finally, someone noticed other than me!
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Ben on May 02, 2011, 10:58:58 am
I dont see any point for that ben, since ONLY uc officers can see you are UC officer too.

And when a SAPD officer recieve a UC badge, that is because he is trustable.
Last time I checked, UC Officers had "normal duty rights" and non-UC have "Normal duty rights". See the difference?  ;)
Finally, someone noticed other than me!
Hehe, that's what I'm thinking  :lol:
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Reece on May 03, 2011, 00:38:12 am
Ignore my typo.

But,

http://img13.imageshack.us/i/bugzors.png (http://img13.imageshack.us/i/bugzors.png)
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Mike Collin on May 03, 2011, 23:18:27 pm
Any ranks are only showed to people that have them, with exception of some groups.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Ben on May 03, 2011, 23:25:04 pm
Any ranks are only showed to people that have them, with exception of some groups.
Any cop on duty can see the mistake made with the capital letter, as proved by the screenshot above.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Nancy_Parker on May 06, 2011, 15:41:15 pm
Just idea, what about one time UC rights? Which will be gone after relog, server restart or taken by command staff. So more people have chance to train as UC and plan operations.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Exterminator on May 06, 2011, 15:47:51 pm
Just idea, what about one time UC rights? Which will be gone after relog, server restart or taken by command staff. So more people have chance to train as UC and plan operations.

Not possible at all, matter of fact UC rights are being nailed down.
SADA handles most of the UC work, other than that each department gets only 2 UC officers and they are very cautious about them.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Chief J. Schappell on May 06, 2011, 22:31:29 pm
Nancy, not a bad idea, but if the user crashes, their cover is blown unfortunately.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Nancy_Parker on May 12, 2011, 12:16:14 pm
Nancy, not a bad idea, but if the user crashes, their cover is blown unfortunately.

Well, that's right but you wont lose anything.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Ben on May 12, 2011, 17:47:47 pm
Just idea, what about one time UC rights? Which will be gone after relog, server restart or taken by command staff. So more people have chance to train as UC and plan operations.
Well, when I went UC it was a two week period maximum, and that was about right for getting yourself known as a criminal, and to do some drug deals.
One-time UC rights may mean you get smaller drug busts, as a lot of criminals are very cautious about who they sell to. If I was one, and I saw a new name, then I would be very suspicious.
Title: Re: Undercover update idea
Post by: Chief J. Schappell on May 12, 2011, 20:28:46 pm
Nancy, not a bad idea, but if the user crashes, their cover is blown unfortunately.

Well, that's right but you wont lose anything.
True, except losing your undercover rights could ruin the entire operation, though. Don't get me wrong...your idea is a great start. Keep them coming. It's the unique ideas like that from which awesome solutions and fun features are made! :cop:
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal