Undercover update idea

[JunkMan]

1-i think undercover should not be showed in /rank because it can be used against cops as against criminals catching them dealing for example
2- when an undercover suspect someone it puts undercover instead of his name, it will help the UC to have the ability to suspect someone near him without the suspect knowing who is the undercover which will make the UC wont be caught easily. for example:"X(X) was been suspected by an undercover reason: planing for a riot" and senior officers plus can see who suspected the suspect in case of investigation.

[SeanC]

I like this idea, Ziad, very nice..

[[R*]Drix]

First one is already made, as about the second one i don't know.

[Nicholas Baker]

Only undercover officers can see in rank if someone has UC Rights.

Second one is ok i guess

[FlameMan]

"TestName(ID) was suspected by an undercover detective for reason."

[Giovanni_Blake]

"TestName(ID) was suspected by an undercover detective for reason."

yeah

[JunkMan]

"TestName(ID) was suspected by an undercover detective for reason."

This 

[SeanC]

"TestName(ID) was suspected by an undercover detective for reason."

Yeah, would be awesome especially for the new San Andreas Detective Agency..

[[SN]GHunter]

+1

[Janar]

2nd is pointless idea.
Only UC cop and suspect, cop suspects him, then it's obvious that the suspecting person was UC cop.
Grab an assault team and tell them to suspect to not blow your cover.

[JunkMan]

its more secured janar.

[Nexus Riggs]

1st one would be kind of abuse since it has more publicity more corruptions may occur like example: Mafia member or new cop decides to be funny and reveals an important undercover person as Mafia or new cop may not care or not know the importance. Undercover suppose to be totally confidential, only to be seen by assigned Police Department.

[Allison]

The first idea is already in place, you can only see if they are undercover if you are an undercover officer as well. As for the 2nd idea, I support it as it gives more ability to not be specified as the UC officer directly.

[Ronnel]

If the first idea is implemented then understand that if any ARPD or non-UC cop gest suspended or demoted for treating an UC cop like a criminal, this will be the end of any UC rights.

The second idea is even worse.

[JunkMan]

The second idea is even worse.

what is the worse in the second idea ? i will take you to IRL when a UC is arround bunch of criminals that are doing something he launch on radio that bunch of criminals are doing anything and put them as suspect but do they know ? they don't because he is simply a UC.

The first idea is already in place, you can only see if they are undercover if you are an undercover officer as well. As for the 2nd idea, I support it as it gives more ability to not be specified as the UC officer directly.

Every single command can be abused.

[iMarkz]

Supported both of two ideas.

[Ben]

I would also suggest that when non-UC people /rank people who are undercover, they cannot see that they have an SAPD Rank. E.g. :

Ben_Blake's Rank is ARPD Officer
Normal Duty Rights

instead of how it is at the moment, still showing the SAPD ranks 

[JunkMan]

I would also suggest that when non-UC people /rank people who are undercover, they cannot see that they have an SAPD Rank. E.g. :

Ben_Blake's Rank is ARPD Officer
Normal Duty Rights

instead of how it is at the moment, still showing the SAPD ranks 

this

[Nexus Riggs]

I would also suggest that when non-UC people /rank people who are undercover, they cannot see that they have an SAPD Rank. E.g. :

Ben_Blake's Rank is ARPD Officer
Normal Duty Rights

instead of how it is at the moment, still showing the SAPD ranks 

This could be interesting! support it!

[Fred]

I dont see any point for that ben, since ONLY uc officers can see you are UC officer too.

And when a SAPD officer recieve a UC badge, that is because he is trustable.