I was heading northbound towards Las Venturas to respond to a suspect in that area.
(Code 2 with ELS lights)
I also want to mention is that I was extremely cation when driving up the ramp as I saw the civilian.
As I see Monkey is claiming I was putting endangerment to civilians, I find that completely invalid as I was driving with cautioness.
If this accusement is seen by any as valid, it can be compared as breaking ANY traffic law as endangerment,
The same goes for the reckless driving, it was neccesary to prevent further crime from the suspect and as mentioned before.
How did I put a civilian under a "risk" when I was passing him with my ELS lights on?
Why didnt I get notified before or afterwards about this "checkpoint" thing?
Having a ARA traffic checkpoint doesent imply having extra strict traffic rules, correct?
I was heading northbound towards Las Venturas to respond to a suspect in that area.
Are you able to show logs of you reporting this in the radio?
(Code 2 with ELS lights)
I see no police lighting in the video
I also want to mention is that I was extremely cation when driving up the ramp as I saw the civilian.
As I see Monkey is claiming I was putting endangerment to civilians, I find that completely invalid as I was driving with cautioness.
No matter, many people are coming down the hill at high speeds due to them just coming off of an highway.
If this accusement is seen by any as valid, it can be compared as breaking ANY traffic law as endangerment,
The same goes for the reckless driving, it was neccesary to prevent further crime from the suspect and as mentioned before.
Breaking any traffic law is dangerous, that's why they are there..
How did I put a civilian under a "risk" when I was passing him with my ELS lights on?
Driving the wrong way up a busy junction, that is the risk. ELS or not, drivers wouldn't have time to react(Oliver breaking hard for example)
Why didnt I get notified before or afterwards about this "checkpoint" thing?
Many advertisment's were placed in main chat. I have witnesses to confirm it. I could even get a log check from managers if you wish?[/qoute]
Doesent matter at all if you did advertisments at all in this case, you cant expect anyone to see them and I did not either. So this doesent hold up as any arguement.Having a ARA traffic checkpoint doesent imply having extra strict traffic rules, correct?
It does. Lowered speed limits are placed to reduce injury to roadworkers, and civlians
I have nothing further to say as my points have been made clear
In all respect Jones, its completely unecesarry to point out that I acted in an incorrect manner when you dont have all the facts in this case.
Its up to Def Perry how this case ends, and the result of the decision might have some consequenses as alot of officers are doing alot of more mayor things like this case, in general.
Anyway, I did never hit any vehicle, even the civilian said that so its false by you to claim that I did, so you as a Judge are implying that if I did not hit a vehicle (like I didnt) the statement I already gave is true, that I am not guilty of any reckless driving?
Like you said... "The point where you hit the vehicle goes beyond the underlined text" I did not hit any vehicle, therefor my statement is correct, this case is not valid and I am not guilty in whatsoever reckless driving.
How can I endangering him with a speed under the speedlimit, driving off road (if he was to crash into me that would be his fault) and being with ELS lights on?
If passing a civilian vehicle endangering civilains, every officer should be reported already, so I took the action neccesary needed to get as quick as possible to the criminal.