User Info
Recent Posts
A smarter way to preview your next haircut by Richarddum [June 26, 2026, 03:07:34 am]
A more precise way to understand what suits you by Richarddum [June 24, 2026, 02:23:17 am]
A personalized haircut report with a practical edge by Richarddum [June 21, 2026, 01:09:51 am]
Womens From Your City - Anonymous Adult Dating - No Verify by Gruia [May 12, 2026, 15:02:39 pm]
VCPD || Retiring the use of the forum by Huntsman [November 26, 2024, 14:09:18 pm]
Who's Online
Search
|
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
« Last post by Hazard on September 27, 2022, 21:21:07 pm »
VCPD Officer Hazard
Greetings, this is Officer Hazard and I'm about to answer every question that is asked. 1. Can explain your POV, focusing on the actions prior to 10:51 CET when you and FBI Special Agent Kowalski were involved in the traffic stop.
- I pulled over Sup_ while we were having a discussion because he was moving away slowly and slowly. Basically the purpose of /pull-overing Sup_ was to not make him move away from the radio of the Police. After I was done, Kowalski and I was having discussion. After I was told by Kowalski to suspect Sup_ for the reason "Endangerment / Brandishing a firearm" I went near him, suspected him and then he immediately surrendered. After that as soon as Kowalski told me to read the gentleman(Sup_) his Miranda rights.. the smuggle happened. Since I was just half part of the investigation.. I asked the permission from Kowaski for the smuggle and went for it. 2. Why did you need to perform a traffic stop at all, if the crime happened prior?
- As I already said above, he was moving slowly and gradually away from us so I had to immediately stop him because I couldn't take a decision quickly.. I was still having a discussion while he was keep moving away. 3. Please elaborate on your charges of "Endangerment" and explain in detail why you believed Mr Sanchez's actions were dangerous.
- First of all, it is un-acceptable for civilians to shoot and comes under the crime "Public Endangerment" so it is forbidden for people to start shooting. In Sup_'s case, he was shooting the car on the road near Cherry Popers where people pass daily. There were two police officers present near the action which could've harmed them or either the people who pass through their vehicles on the road. It is considered a violation of law to open fire in the public. 4. Explain why the suspect you arrested, and therefore under your custody, ended up being left with the FBI?
- It wasn't actually my custody because I wasn't the one cuffing him and putting him in the car. I was told to but I asked the FBI to let me go for the smuggle work and handle the criminal if you can because we both issued the criminal suspection so it was the right of both, anyone could do the job so I simply asked him to do and I'll rather take care of the smuggle. 5. Can you provide any recording (logs) from between 10:30 CET and 11:05 CET? Preferably any recording from the Police CB channel.
- I have provided them below. Spoiler (Click to expand)
72
« Last post by Huntsman on September 27, 2022, 11:34:13 am »
Amazing Report. I am happy to see that despite you claiming you are unfamiliar with police roleplay, you've displayed exceptional roleplay skills. For this reason, I am granting you the Police Roleplay competence required to pass the academy. Your record currently looks as follows:
Vice City Police Department Academy
CADET FILE:Ferrari32 Accepted on: 2022 September 26
Notes/Remarks: --- Redacted ---
Competences:
V - Granted - - Needs more training X - Critical failure, needs extensive training
[] Knowledge of Protocol Evaluated by: [V] Police Roleplay Evaluated by: Gabriel Adams, Chief of Police. [] Basics of Policing Evaluated by: [] Pursuit Evaluated by: [] Combat Evaluated by: [] Map Knowledge Evaluated by: [] Evidence Processing and Investigation Evaluated by:
73
« Last post by danigold on September 27, 2022, 09:40:42 am »
I instructed the arresting officer to do so as he was learning to navigate an arrest, as I've previously said, and I was there to assist him in doing so. Now while this order was unfortunately missed by Officer Hazard.
You were there during the whole time (except those 10 minutes in which you abandoned my client locked and handcuffed inside a hot car) yet you failed to make sure the Miranda Rights were promptly read to my client upon his arrest. You're still trying to throw the blame on Hazard it seems.. transported [Homero] to the station.
Yea you did, after which you promptly and negligently left him alone in a hot car. I do still deny any claims of vandalism and do wish to point out that while there was no smoke per se, the complainant cannot clearly discern the amount of damage to the vehicle nor can they actually mitigate the risks. The vehicles were smashed up, which the footage shows.
So the complainant cannot clearly discern the amount of damage to the vehicles, yet you can? Are you a mechanic or something? How were you able to discern that despite not having any amount of smoke that the vehicles were a hazard to the people? Just because you see a car with a few lightly damaged parts you get to shoot them? Are you aware that these vehicles could be fixed? Are you aware that these vehicles are people's property, which you destroyed? I went ahead and did yet another test to debunk your silly and made up excuses, in which I had a car's parts damaged, approximately to the same level of the vehicles in the initial evidence of you destroying people's property, and had it's condition expertly diagnosed and analyzed at a Pay'N'Spray, after which it was fixed to being brand new for the mere $150 ARD, the car's in the initial evidence of you causing explosions using people's property could have been safely towed, and could have been fixed, easily. Test results: https://imgur.com/a/eEqZXHJYou unnecessarily destroyed people's property, yet you claim no vandalism was done on your part? Please, take your own advice, and read the law.
74
« Last post by Kowalski. on September 27, 2022, 06:33:18 am »
2. Did you take custody of the suspect from VCPD Officer Hazard, and was this properly communicated?
2.) I did not. If anything, I communicated the contrary. At the end of the interrogation of Mr. Sanchez, I specifically reiterated that any detainment or release of the suspect in custody was up to Officer Hazard as he was the arresting officer and the suspect was in his custody.
I'm no expert in the secret lingo used between the FBI and VCPD, but I have these recordings of Hazard asking Kowalski through the police radio if he minds to "go ahead with it" and Kowalski replying with "aight", to which after Hazard has, and my client is alone with Kowalski. Sounds a bit like one law enforcement official handing over the custody of a suspect to another law enforcement official.
Spoiler (Click to expand)
Regarding the claims of not reading miranda rights, it is evident that I instructed the arresting officer to read out those miranda rights by the following recording:  I instructed the arresting officer to do so as he was learning to navigate an arrest, as I've previously said, and I was there to assist him in doing so. Now while this order was unfortunately missed by Officer Hazard, I made sure to reiterate those rights as a result of the oversight on-scene. This was to ensure the suspect was still entitled to his civil rights as per the constitution. You said it yourself, Ms. Slaughter, people make mistakes. Officer Hazard made one as he is still learning to navigate an arrest, which is why I was there, to begin with. Either way nothing you've said changes the fact that Officer Hazard made the calls as the arresting officer, which is clearly indicated here during the interrogation.  And just for the information of the command, I didn't take custody of the suspect but transported him to the station. I still would've waited for Officer Hazard. Other officers or agents can transport suspects as needed, however, it doesn't necessarily change the arresting officer or the person under whose custody a suspect is. Officer Hazard didn't do anything wrong by responding to another priority situation, and I transported the suspect. Officer Hazard responded to a callout which then became more dangerous with lives on the line, including his own. When the stakes got as high as they did, that is when I responded in a bid to try and protect my comrades and of course ensure nobody escaped justice. As I said before, I regret that Mr. Sanchez felt neglected and do apologize to him for any inconvenience or disturbance caused. However, I would ask Mr. Sanchez to see my point of view and understand that the stakes were high and that I was looking to protect the lives of my fellow officers. I do still deny any claims of vandalism and do wish to point out that while there was no smoke per se, the complainant cannot clearly discern the amount of damage to the vehicle nor can they actually mitigate the risks. The vehicles were smashed up, which the footage shows. As for the "controlled testing", I do wish to indicate that a shockwave was still likely to occur, though clearly it is shown by the footage that no glass broke. However, it is the person filming who came even closer and thus put themselves in danger by doing so. The person filming should've looked to move away from danger, not towards it. Regards.
75
« Last post by OmaRosh on September 27, 2022, 03:08:21 am »
Such an amazing report cadet. Excellent job Keep working hard and I'm sure you'll become an officer soon
76
« Last post by VCPR on September 27, 2022, 01:34:42 am »
Excellent report cadet, you sure had an eventful first day  I have to say though, in the third situation your life was at a very high risk, to jump over a car and try to stop it whilst the driver is driving in such a crazy manner is life threatening and that's the last thing we want. Next time try to stop whoever is running away while driving your cruiser rather than risking your life like that. Sergeant Rafael Johnson
77
« Last post by ferrari32 on September 26, 2022, 22:51:53 pm »
Patrol report - VCPD Cadet Ferrari32 Date of patrol: 26th September, 2022Supporting officers (if any): VCPD Officer Jannich (partially)Summarized results (if any): Made 2 arrests and one traffic stopDetailed description of events:1);While on regular patrol, at 2:26 AM during heavy rain weather, by myself and with no supporting units, I have spotted a dark grey convertible jeep, model and make ''Mesa Grande'' being driven by one later identified as [EAF]Pyro. The vehicle in question was in demand with the Viceport smugglers, and the vehicle was spotted moving through the Viceport area. Upon further inspection, I have noticed the driver of the vehicle has failed to turn their lights on, thus endangering the safety of the public and his own. I have ordered the driver to pull over by the side of the road, turn off his ignition, and keep his hands on the wheel. The driver was compliant at first, answering my inquiries and handing me his driver's licence upon request. Once asked for registration, the driver very clearly panicked, which made me suspicious of sinister intentions regarding the Viceport crane. The driver, Pyro, took a long time looking for the registration papers in his car, which prompted me to remain cautious. I have asked him to step out of the vehicle, and have asked him to place his hands on the hood of his vehicle while I check his identification and registration in the squad car. The driver became extremely agitated, and attempted to start an argument with me multiple times. While the driver did refuse to cooperate, even after being asked politely four times to do so, I have noticed that he does not have any malevolent intentions. After reassuring him multiple times, he agreed to cooperate and did as instructed. His papers were checked (for a long enough time), leading to the conclusion that his licence was in order, but the car was indeed registered to someone else. Upon further questioning, the driver stated that the vehicle he operated was owned by a business client of his. In the meantime, the APB for the car went cold, so I've decided to issue the driver a verbal warning and advised him to be more careful in such late hours and heavy weather.2);During a regular patrol around the Little Haiti/Havana area, a man later identified to be one Homero Sanchez, aged 22, driving a ''Pizza boy Faggio'', rammed into my police cruiser, sending him flying 10 feet, and causing damage to my vehicle. As a clear case of endangering his own life and the life of others, he was promptly detained. His unexplicable driving, and his manner of speech after the latter, prompted me to believe the man was intoxicated. With such suspicions, he was frisked, alas no suspicious items were found. Officer Jannich arrived on the scene, and has helped to establish a perimeter on the scene of the crash. The suspect, clearly confused due to the crash, was expedited to VCPD HQ at Washington Beach for processing. Upon arriving at the station, the suspect's credentials were filed, and an informative conversation took place. From the interview it was deduced that the young Homero was the son of a wealthy man, who would be very disappointed to hear of his mishaps. After a small heart to heart, the suspect regretted his crimes and vowed to be more careful in the future. The suspect spent the night in lockup. 3);The second arrest of the evening happened during a patrol including myself, and VCPD Officer Janicch While investigating a person of interest, our squad car got rammed by one later identified to be ''Pratham the Pro''. The suspect has commited hit and run, promptly running back to his car and leading us on a pursuit. In an effort to not let the suspect escape, I jumped and grabbed onto the roof. The suspect started to drive aggresively, attempting to knock me off of his roof. In this situation, I felt it neccesary to disable the vehicle before more damage is done, and harm to both myself and the driver and traffic come. After multiple warnings, I reached for my service shotgun, and with a few well placed shots managed to disable the vehicle while moving. The driver jumped out and attempted to flee on foot. He was promptly stopped by the combined efforts of myself and officer Janicch. The suspect was booked for reckless driving and resisting arrest.
 Conclusion of patrol report, signedSincerely,
VCPD Cadet [VU]Ferrari32
78
« Last post by danigold on September 26, 2022, 22:05:24 pm »
2. Did you take custody of the suspect from VCPD Officer Hazard, and was this properly communicated?
2.) I did not. If anything, I communicated the contrary. At the end of the interrogation of Mr. Sanchez, I specifically reiterated that any detainment or release of the suspect in custody was up to Officer Hazard as he was the arresting officer and the suspect was in his custody.
I'm no expert in the secret lingo used between the FBI and VCPD, but I have these recordings of Hazard asking Kowalski through the police radio if he minds to "go ahead with it" and Kowalski replying with "aight", to which after Hazard has, and my client is alone with Kowalski. Sounds a bit like one law enforcement official handing over the custody of a suspect to another law enforcement official. Spoiler (Click to expand)
79
« Last post by Kowalski. on September 26, 2022, 21:41:46 pm »
Greetings, I've argued my case and will only address questions from my superiors at this stage unless otherwise requested by those same superiors. FBI Special Agent Kowalski 1. Why were you involved in the traffic stop, and why did you think the VCPD required FBI assistance? 2. Did you take custody of the suspect from VCPD Officer Hazard, and was this properly communicated? 3. Why did you escort the suspect, and not the arresting Officer? 4. Do you think it is ok to leave a suspect alone, without supervision? 5. Elaborate on the Code 1, that in your defence forced you to leave the suspect behind.
To answer your questions: 1.) My involvement was merely to guide and assist Officer Hazard in making an arrest. I'm aware he is still getting acquainted with certain things and so I looked to assist him so he might learn a thing or two as I was on standby and able to help, though ready to move if need be. 2.) I did not. If anything, I communicated the contrary. At the end of the interrogation of Mr. Sanchez, I specifically reiterated that any detainment or release of the suspect in custody was up to Officer Hazard as he was the arresting officer and the suspect was in his custody. 3.) Respectfully, a transportation of a suspect was not a takeover of the situation but an aid to a fellow officer. I had brought the cruiser over to assist Officer Hazard as he began his arrest. My reason for transporting the suspect was to aid the arresting officer. 4.) Under normal circumstances, not at all. If it weren't for the circumstances I stated, I would not have left the suspect. Only in an extreme circumstance such as the life or death of a fellow officer, for example, would this be justifiable. 5.) The situation was a smuggle voyage. Aside from obvious surveillance tasks in case a smuggler escaped, I saw that my fellow officers were in direct danger and I rushed to their aid. I was concerned for the life and safety of my colleagues. As a result, I do regret that Mr. Sanchez felt neglected and do apologize to him for any inconvenience or other disturbance caused. I did indeed also provide Mr. Sanchez with the water he requested, offered him a tea or coffee, which shows there was no malicious treatment of a suspect in custody. However I do stand by my decision to rush to assist my fellow officers as this was life or death, and indeed, the suspect was outside a police station where an officer could've also tended to the suspect at any moment as I'm not the only law enforcement operative in the state. Regards, Kowalski FBI Special Agent.
80
« Last post by Ellis F. on September 26, 2022, 20:09:53 pm »
Homero Sanchez 1. ((Were you or were you not AFK at some point between 10:51 and 11:05 CET. I will check logs to make sure but I want to hear the truth from you ))
((Yes I was afk for 1 full minute moments before arriving to WBPD as I had said right before then through /em I needed a minute))
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
|