Author Topic: Jailing process should have some changes (Read 6181 times)

saberman · « **on:** November 18, 2010, 10:00:53 am »

As some of the times I bring a suspect at lspd for jailing, I almost jailed him by the time another cop jails him. I say only the person who has cuffed the suspect should jail him. Please do consider this complain. Thank you.

Joseph_Allen · « **Reply #1 on:** November 18, 2010, 12:17:54 pm »

Mack · « **Reply #2 on:** November 18, 2010, 12:22:14 pm »

Yup.. this should be easy to script too.. But unless the admins/scripter don't agree here, nothing we can do.

Safwan · « **Reply #3 on:** November 18, 2010, 16:02:39 pm »

Agreed.

Champion266 · « **Reply #4 on:** November 18, 2010, 17:35:37 pm »

nothing will change by this the abusers will try to get you away from him or wait when you enter the pd and cuff the suspect before you,it will only decrease the chances of us actually able to jail our original suspects and if you are too afraid to jail at LSPD jail at DPD or FCPD or any other PD

Jcstodds · « **Reply #5 on:** November 18, 2010, 18:40:57 pm »

I agree with Champion. Jail suspect at a less populated PD to decrease the chances of someone stealing them

Mack · « **Reply #6 on:** November 18, 2010, 19:12:35 pm »

Quote from: Jcstodds on November 18, 2010, 18:40:57 pm

I agree with Champion. Jail suspect at a less populated PD to decrease the chances of someone stealing them

While I'd agree.. but roleplay wise.. you do jail the suspect from the jurisdiction you got him at. Plus its odd, you get a suspect in LS, and take him to DPD/LVPD just cause of fear of suspect being stolen :/
I've given up really, I let others steal my /jail now

Jcstodds · « **Reply #7 on:** November 18, 2010, 23:17:49 pm »

DPD is very close to LS, and RP wise majority of my suspects are given RP punishment, and if they do go to jail, they go to the grotty horrible jails of DPD or FCPD, where there is no danger of them being randomly killed by a ARPD officer.

Sushi · « **Reply #8 on:** November 21, 2010, 23:52:38 pm »

I'm very split on my opinion right now. Although it seems like a good idea, it probably won't help much.

Joseph_Allen · « **Reply #9 on:** November 22, 2010, 08:33:26 am »

Quote from: Kelvin S Gould on November 21, 2010, 23:52:38 pm

I'm very split on my opinion right now. Although it seems like a good idea, it probably won't help much.

True, an abuser could just wait for the Officer to lose /cuff then steal the suspect. Or he could be more rash and simply kill said Officer.

The problem isn't with the system, it's the people implementing it.

Chief J. Schappell · « **Reply #10 on:** November 22, 2010, 08:46:38 am »

Quote from: Joseph_Allen on November 22, 2010, 08:33:26 am

Quote from: Kelvin S Gould on November 21, 2010, 23:52:38 pm
I'm very split on my opinion right now. Although it seems like a good idea, it probably won't help much.

True, an abuser could just wait for the Officer to lose /cuff then steal the suspect. Or he could be more rash and simply kill said Officer.

The problem isn't with the system, it's the people implementing it.

Using*, not implementing lol

Sushi · « **Reply #11 on:** November 22, 2010, 13:40:35 pm »

Basically, as usual we need more teaching among people.

Mahome · « **Reply #12 on:** November 22, 2010, 14:39:43 pm »

Jail at DPD or other department where it's less populated. Problem solved. If suspect moans about it, tough and it's for safety of his because more than 50 suspects in my career I had has been killed whilst he was /gued.

Joseph_Allen · « **Reply #13 on:** November 22, 2010, 15:03:51 pm »

Quote from: Kelvin S Gould on November 22, 2010, 13:40:35 pm

Basically, as usual we need more teaching among people.

True. Then again, some people don't want to learn.

Quote from: Jack Schappell on November 22, 2010, 08:46:38 am

Quote from: Joseph_Allen on November 22, 2010, 08:33:26 am
Quote from: Kelvin S Gould on November 21, 2010, 23:52:38 pm
I'm very split on my opinion right now. Although it seems like a good idea, it probably won't help much.

True, an abuser could just wait for the Officer to lose /cuff then steal the suspect. Or he could be more rash and simply kill said Officer.

The problem isn't with the system, it's the people implementing it.
Using*, not implementing lol

It's definitely implementing. Using implies that we're taking the law to our advantage.
Implementing means we make sure it's being followed.

Chief J. Schappell · « **Reply #14 on:** November 22, 2010, 21:02:06 pm »

Umm, no?

"The problem isn't with the system, it's the people implementing it."

That is stating that the people implementing the system are the one's at fault. They aren't the ones abusing the system, the people that are using it are the ones abusing it.

James Bowling · « **Reply #15 on:** November 23, 2010, 03:14:25 am »

This issue for the most part only arises with ARPD Officers... We have no direct control over them.. Since this is not exactly copbanable and it is not a server rule break..

Jcstodds · « **Reply #16 on:** November 23, 2010, 12:22:02 pm »

]USE COMMON SENSE!

Joseph_Allen · « **Reply #17 on:** November 23, 2010, 12:28:56 pm »

Quote from: Jack Schappell on November 22, 2010, 21:02:06 pm

Umm, no?

"The problem isn't with the system, it's the people implementing it."

That is stating that the people implementing the system are the one's at fault. They aren't the ones abusing the system, the people that are using it are the ones abusing it.

*Takes a look at his quote*
*Takes a look at Jack's quote*
*Facepalms*

I get what you mean, I take it back. -_-'

Sushi · « **Reply #18 on:** November 23, 2010, 14:04:31 pm »

We understand why it happens, now we need to solve it through education!

Wake · « **Reply #19 on:** November 23, 2010, 14:46:07 pm »

This is already suggested on Argonath forums.
and only let cops who did /cuff jail the suspect wont stop it. As they still will camp
and do /cuff then /jail

User Info

Recent Posts

Who's Online

Search

Author Topic: Jailing process should have some changes (Read 6181 times)