| Date: 23-11-24  Time: 14:39 pm
collapse

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Recent Posts

New Ownership of Argonath RPG by Jcstodds
[August 14, 2024, 21:48:55 pm]


Re: ARPD Promotions & Awards by Tom Adams
[August 16, 2023, 11:28:58 am]


Re: ARPD Promotions & Awards by Shen
[August 12, 2023, 10:05:10 am]


Re: San Andreas Police Department | Recruitment Process [MUST BE READ] by Shen
[August 10, 2023, 16:56:52 pm]


Re: ARPD Promotions & Awards by Khm
[August 08, 2023, 21:42:27 pm]

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 498
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Search


Author Topic: A query regarding Weapon laws  (Read 5859 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nathan_Kolta

  • That Paramedic Bastard
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 35
  • For Honor, For Country, For Brother
Re: A query regarding Weapon laws
« Reply #20 on: May 07, 2012, 15:20:55 pm »
ADF even had rights to use the hydra and hunter, but that got abused abit.. But I don't get why you AAF always are here to moan on ARPD? You wanted answers and you got answers from us.

Im sorry, what? This is the first time I am aware of. Show me other cases of us moaning please

Paul Im going to ask a manager with hopes of finding some actuall evidence because Im not getting any here
"But regarding the topic.. even if ADF was official or not, they will have no rights at all to assist the ARPD without permission."
Where did I ask this?

"Showing weapons in a pullover against two BCSD Deputies certainly isin't the "Lawful purpose""
Names please, next time let me know when it happens, not keep it to yourself


Offline Chief J. Schappell

  • ARFD Commissioner
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 3612
  • Badge-ID: #ARPD565
Re: A query regarding Weapon laws
« Reply #21 on: May 07, 2012, 21:40:14 pm »
I remember one time around some months ago the founder stated that the group was official.
Could be wRONg though if it was false from the leader itself which i trusted.

But regarding the topic.. even if ADF was official or not, they will have no rights at all to assist the ARPD without permission.
Well ADF was recognized and given some rights just as USAA was at the time, but the main reason why they weren't made official, even when completely active and running strong, was because there were 2 competing military groups with limited script support that Argo recognized, and the Server Owners didn't think it'd be fair to make one official and not the other, but having 2 would have been unnecessary overkill and would create heavy competition.

The situation regarding such has been misunderstood many times over the last 2 years due to the limited script and server support, but lack of official status, so don't be surprised if you get conflicting information from different sides. :cop:

Offline Teddy

  • Citizen
  • Posts: 254
    • Skype - martinezderek10
Re: A query regarding Weapon laws
« Reply #22 on: May 07, 2012, 22:01:00 pm »
Unless you're an official law enforcement officer that is in danger/under threat, you should not brandish a weapon in public.

Incorrect again. There are two official military groups currently.

- MGI
- ADF

End of story.


ADF is 'supported' but remains unofficial; similar to the CIA; they are supported, but unofficial.
MGI, is official last I was aware also, MGI isn't really a military group; they are more of mercs.

Overall, in short YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO OVER HAVE GUNS OUT unless authorized by SAPD/FBI ranked members.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal