Author Topic: Somewhat of a more realistic structure (Read 12544 times)

Pepper · « **on:** December 13, 2010, 14:07:07 pm »

Right now, I think it's just pancher that's the chief. My proposal is that every dept. has their own ranks.

Ex:

LSPD(Making up names for ranks as I don't know who's in what position
Chief - Vince
Dept. Chief - Ben
Cpt - Kirby
Lt. - bob
Lt. - joe
Sgt. - Jimmy boy
Sr. Officer - Deodorant
Sr. Officer - Jim
Officer - Billy Bob
Officer - ect.

and then so on. and every dept. having their own ranknig ssystem, own chief, own stuff man.

/discuss. (Side note: I'm writing this before school so I kinda left out some parts, if I can remember what they were, I'll re-add them.

Sushi · « **Reply #1 on:** December 13, 2010, 14:49:08 pm »

I'm not sure about this kind of ranking system, but I'm on the edge now. I do agree that perhaps we may need a system reform? But that's for the LSPD Board.

J. Prilo · « **Reply #2 on:** December 13, 2010, 14:53:38 pm »

So..technically you just want every department to have a Chief?

Sushi · « **Reply #3 on:** December 13, 2010, 14:58:14 pm »

I think that's what his getting at. Since CBFasi is the head of the ARPD and Pancher is a Chief that is in control of SFPD, whilst Hank is the lead of the LVPD and Vince is the lead of the LSPD.

Leroy Hudson · « **Reply #4 on:** December 13, 2010, 17:42:29 pm »

The leader of each Department is referred as the 'Chief of Department', The Chief of Police being Pancher/Hank/Vince are there so if anything may go wrong, they will step in, such as globally handling all Departments and such.

Oliver Daniels · « **Reply #5 on:** December 13, 2010, 18:08:52 pm »

Quote from: [SE]Dr_Pepper27 on December 13, 2010, 14:07:07 pm

Cpt - Kirby

Edward Miller · « **Reply #6 on:** December 13, 2010, 18:30:15 pm »

Quote from: Gunslinging Elf on December 13, 2010, 18:08:52 pm

Quote from: [SE]Dr_Pepper27 on December 13, 2010, 14:07:07 pm
Cpt - Kirby

Your posts are special, you always make my day by crazy pictures or comments. ;D

Sago · « **Reply #7 on:** December 13, 2010, 19:44:09 pm »

Quote from: [SE]Dr_Pepper27 on December 13, 2010, 14:07:07 pm

Cpt - Kirby

[Rstar]Paul · « **Reply #8 on:** December 13, 2010, 19:56:06 pm »

Quote from: Gangsta Claus on December 13, 2010, 19:44:09 pm

Quote from: [SE]Dr_Pepper27 on December 13, 2010, 14:07:07 pm
Cpt - Kirby

Looooooooooool..you make me Laugh Kirby

James Bowling · « **Reply #9 on:** December 13, 2010, 20:16:30 pm »

Quote from: [SE]Dr_Pepper27 on December 13, 2010, 14:07:07 pm

Sgt. - Jimmy boy

Boooo

Ben · « **Reply #10 on:** December 13, 2010, 20:58:18 pm »

Quote from: [SE]Dr_Pepper27 on December 13, 2010, 14:07:07 pm

Right now, I think it's just pancher that's the chief. My proposal is that every dept. has their own ranks.

Ex:

LSPD(Making up names for ranks as I don't know who's in what position
Chief - Vince
Dept. Chief - Ben
Cpt - Kirby
Lt. - bob
Lt. - joe
Sgt. - Jimmy boy
Sr. Officer - Deodorant
Sr. Officer - Jim
Officer - Billy Bob
Officer - etc.

Ok, I can understand where you are going with this...but it is not needed. I do agree that ranks should be evened up, but maybe it should be doe by taking Chiefs out of departments, and saying that they have control over all the departments, not specifying one in particular. This would leave Captains/Lieutenants to run the police departments.

[Rstar]Vince · « **Reply #11 on:** December 13, 2010, 21:10:57 pm »

Every department already has a 'Chief' so to speak. I run LSPD, Pancher runs SFPD, and Hank runs LVPD. The only department without one is DPD, which is run by a few guys to make up for it.

Chief J. Schappell · « **Reply #12 on:** December 13, 2010, 21:57:20 pm »

I thought that was the Captains job...

To be honest, it might fix alot of confusion if you, Vince, were just bumped up to Chief and the departments were separated by ranks like the past, so each has an official Chief and below. Then they would be linked the same way they are now, plus you have CBFasi as an overall ARPD Leader to keep a check going on the Chiefs, just as they would do to him. This keeps everyone in a safe and watched position, which prevents corruption, rids confusion, and makes each department's work easier, all the while keeping them unified like they are right now. It also opens up the possibility for more promotions to deserving officers, since there would be more ranks to *eventually* fill.

Pepper · « **Reply #13 on:** December 14, 2010, 04:46:46 am »

So, Vince is technically chief ??

Chief J. Schappell · « **Reply #14 on:** December 14, 2010, 06:51:54 am »

Quote from: [SE]Dr_Pepper27 on December 14, 2010, 04:46:46 am

So, Vince is technically chief ??

To LSPD, yes. To SAPD, he's the guy that steps in if all Chiefs are unavailable...

[Rstar]Paul · « **Reply #15 on:** December 14, 2010, 11:17:49 am »

Captain Swig !!!!

Fred · « **Reply #16 on:** December 14, 2010, 13:19:47 pm »

Well with your suggestion, The SAPD structore will be separed, It mean A individual citys and not a global one (San andreas). The chiefs and highers ranks, are on all Higher citys and countrys. Then I dont see any point for get your suggestion to SAPD.

Chief J. Schappell · « **Reply #17 on:** December 14, 2010, 14:07:23 pm »

Quote from: Fred on December 14, 2010, 13:19:47 pm

Well with your suggestion, The SAPD structore will be separed, It mean A individual citys and not a global one (San andreas). The chiefs and highers ranks, are on all Higher citys and countrys. Then I dont see any point for get your suggestion to SAPD.

It would be exactly the same as it is now, just with one person being promoted and the Chiefs being the heads of the departments instead of Captains with Deputy Chiefs and Chiefs picking their favorites to support...

Quote from: PaulC on December 14, 2010, 11:17:49 am